Trump, Fighting Contempt Fines, Says He Doesn’t Have Records

Donald Trump’s lawyers, seeking to reverse their client’s $10,000-per-day contempt fine, provided a New York judge Friday with an affidavit in which the former president says he didn’t turn over subpoenaed documents to the state attorney general’s office because he doesn’t have them. 

The judge, though, was unmoved and refused to lift sanctions he imposed on Trump on Monday. Judge Arthur Engoron criticized the lack of detail in Trump affidavit, which amounted to two paragraphs, saying that he should have explained the methods he uses to store his records and efforts he made to locate the subpoenaed files. 

In the affidavit, which bore Trump’s signature and Wednesday’s date, the former president said that documents sought in Attorney General Letitia James’ civil investigation into his business dealings weren’t in his personal possession. Trump said he believed any documents would be in the possession of his company, the Trump Organization. 

In other affidavits, Trump lawyers Alina Habba and Michael Madaio detailed steps they took to locate documents in the December 1 subpoena, including meeting with Trump last month at Mar-a-Lago in Florida and reviewing prior searches of his company’s files. 

Andrew Amer, a lawyer for the attorney general’s office, said in a court filing that while the affidavits “provide some additional information” about Trump’s efforts to comply with the subpoena, more extensive searches were needed — including of Trump Tower, his residences and electronic devices — before the judge should consider reversing the contempt finding. 

Frank Runyeon, a reporter for the legal publication Law360, said that Engoron held an impromptu hearing Friday, without a court stenographer, in which he addressed the affidavits from Trump and his lawyers and ruled to keep the contempt fine in place. 

‘Where did he keep files?’

Runyeon, one of the few members of the news media to attend the unadvertised hearing, reported that Engoron was insistent that Trump provide the “who, when, where, what” of his search, with the judge asking at one point: “Where did he keep files? I assume it wasn’t all in his head.” 

Habba filed a notice of appeal Wednesday with the appellate division of the state’s trial court seeking to overturn Engoron’s contempt ruling. Trump is also challenging Engoron’s February 17 ruling requiring that he answer questions under oath. Oral arguments in that appeal are scheduled for May 11. 

James has said that her investigation has uncovered evidence that Trump may have misstated the value of assets like skyscrapers and golf courses on his financial statements for more than a decade. Her December 1 subpoena sought numerous documents, including paperwork and communications pertaining to his financial statements and various development projects. 

James asked Engoron to hold Trump in contempt after he failed to produce any documents by a March 31 court deadline. In his ruling, Engoron said that Trump and his lawyers not only failed to meet the deadline but also failed to document the steps they had taken to search for the documents, as required under case law. 

Trump is suing James in federal court to try to stop her investigation. Oral arguments in that matter are scheduled for May 13. 

Trump has said James’ investigation and a separate criminal probe overseen by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg are politically motivated. James and Bragg are Democrats, and Trump is a Republican.

Bragg said this month that the three-year-old investigation he inherited in January from his predecessor, Cyrus Vance Jr., is continuing “without fear or favor” despite a recent shakeup in the probe’s leadership. Trump’s lawyers contend that James is using her civil investigation to gain access to information that could then be used against him in the criminal probe. 

So far, the district attorney’s investigation has resulted in tax fraud charges against the Trump Organization and its longtime finance chief, Allen Weisselberg, relating to lucrative fringe benefits such as rent, car payments and school tuition. The company and Weisselberg have pleaded not guilty.

leave a reply